rheaitis (
toujours_nigel) wrote2019-01-26 05:38 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
re: money ruins fandom
In my experience*, the acceptability of fandom in the Global North has involved a disavowal and pushing-under-the-bus of non-transformative and for-profit piracy which characterises fannish experience in the Global South.
So it is fascinating to watch how the intersection of transformative and for-profit piracy works upon people.
* as both a fan from the Global South for the last decade and half, and a piracy researcher in the last three years.
So it is fascinating to watch how the intersection of transformative and for-profit piracy works upon people.
* as both a fan from the Global South for the last decade and half, and a piracy researcher in the last three years.
no subject
I also wonder whether fandom really is a gift-culture, not in the diluted way that gets talked about, but where the... conspicuous sacrifice of uncompensated time and effort gains status.
no subject
no subject
Re: 19th century American piracy, the Dickensian debacle is... spectacular to say the least.
no subject
The status of people like moderators of mailing lists and LJ/DW communities? And perhaps also those who run gift exchanges—if they run successfully, that is, and for several years. Certainly, all of these can fail spectacularly. The effort put in by good mods can be enormous; and I think they're highly respected by those who take the time to think about it.
I personally admire those who work so hard on Fanlore (and feel rather guilty that I'm doing so much less wiki work nowadays).
no subject
Yes, exactly! But I would also include prolific creators of fanworks, whether writers, artists, podficcers, meta-writers, reccers, etc. Anyone who contributes substantial labour to fandom, and therefore has "become a name".